> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://jh.gatcg.com/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://jh.gatcg.com/judging-the-basics/teamwork.md).

# Teamwork

Judges seldom act alone. At large tournaments, teams of judges are organized with a Head Judge as a leader and some judges as team leads in specific roles. Teamwork is an important component of judging at events, both for the sake of the judges and for the players. It is far more likely for complex situations to arise at larger events that either need a new precedent established or require an involved and creative fix to maximize the integrity of the tournament. Many times, the experience of a single judge is not enough to correctly assess and fix every situation, even when it comes to simpler ones. In a team, judges may rely on one another's knowledge, experience, and other skills, such as communication, that may result in a far better result during a call than acting alone. While judges should take ownership of a call and attempt to resolve it on their own, judges are expected to recognize when a call is too involved for only their presence or when they lack the knowledge needed to apply an appropriate ruling and/or fix.

By working in a team and relying on the proficiency of fellow judges (especially a Head Judge), not only will individual skills as a judge grow appreciably, but players and tournament organizers can be more confident that an event was handled as fairly as possible and with as much circumspection as possible.

Teamwork is a must at Premier-level events, such as Nationals and Ascents. In these settings, judges can expect that they will be organized into teams for specifics tasks. For example, you might be tasked with performing routine deck checks between rounds at randomly selected tables, or you might be selected as one of the stream judges for media coverage. These specific roles might hone specific skills related to judging and builds on the expectations of judging for Grand Archive. Higher-tier judges may be selected to lead these teams or be assigned as a Head Judge or Assistant Head Judge for these types of events.


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://jh.gatcg.com/judging-the-basics/teamwork.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
